![]() ![]() The test-retest reliability of the P1, N1 and P2 is systematically considered to be satisfactory, whereas findings are more variable for event-related potentials/fields occurring later in time. In total, 11 articles were included in this literature review. PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles based on specific eligibility criteria. Therefore, the current study provides a review on the test-retest reliability of EEG and MEG measures elicited during language paradigms in healthy adults. To use EEG and MEG in a longitudinal way, the outcome measures should be consistent across time in healthy individuals. Electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings during language processing can provide relevant insights on neuroplasticity in clinical populations (including patients with aphasia).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |